<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons Learned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.digitaltinder.net/2005/02/lessons-learned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.digitaltinder.net/2005/02/lessons-learned/</link>
	<description>A chip off the old blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:20:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitaltinder.net/2005/02/lessons-learned/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaltinder.com/blog/archive/2005/02/15/3034.aspx#comment-120</guid>
		<description>well i had a similar case with the house development. You know all about the house development.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;My mother (now working for a law firm) mentioned that if you type up the conversation that happened between myself and the agent (in your case the client) then e-mail it to him and have a header along the lines of &quot;As discused in our conversation&quot; then this is legaly binding in court. if he disagrees to the e-mail he is abliged to reply with the corrections.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I would look at adding something to the footer like. If no objection to this is recieved then this is taken as factual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i had a similar case with the house development. You know all about the house development.</p>
<p>My mother (now working for a law firm) mentioned that if you type up the conversation that happened between myself and the agent (in your case the client) then e-mail it to him and have a header along the lines of &quot;As discused in our conversation&quot; then this is legaly binding in court. if he disagrees to the e-mail he is abliged to reply with the corrections.</p>
<p>I would look at adding something to the footer like. If no objection to this is recieved then this is taken as factual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich...!</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitaltinder.net/2005/02/lessons-learned/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich...!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaltinder.com/blog/archive/2005/02/15/3034.aspx#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Sheeesh, don&#039;t worry bro, I made enemies on this post:
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_new&quot; href=&quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.missinglink.co.za/&quot;&gt;http://www.missinglink.co.za/&lt;/a&gt;blogger2/2004/06/cell-c-for-someone-else.html&quot;&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.missinglink.co.za/&quot;&gt;http://www.missinglink.co.za/&lt;/a&gt;blogger2/2004/06/cell-c-for-someone-else.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s stil on our homepage too:
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.missinglink.co.za/&quot;&gt;http://www.missinglink.co.za/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;To me the bottom line is that if the facts are on your side, you&#039;re just stating your case...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheeesh, don&#8217;t worry bro, I made enemies on this post:</p>
<p><a target="_new" href="<a target="_new" href="http://www.missinglink.co.za/">http://www.missinglink.co.za/</a>blogger2/2004/06/cell-c-for-someone-else.html&#8221;><a target="_new" href="http://www.missinglink.co.za/">http://www.missinglink.co.za/</a>blogger2/2004/06/cell-c-for-someone-else.html</p>
<p>It&#8217;s stil on our homepage too:</p>
<p><a target="_new" href="http://www.missinglink.co.za/">http://www.missinglink.co.za/</a></p>
<p>To me the bottom line is that if the facts are on your side, you&#8217;re just stating your case&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
